Fair Use doctrine is an aspect of United States copyright law that permits use of copyrighted materials without permission of the copyright owner in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the full details of what constitutes fair use. It is decided on a case by case basis which is influenced by four factors:
DISCLAIMER: this article is not intended for legal advice. It is merely for personal reference. For further information, please reach out to a copyright attorney or the US Copyright Office.
The first factor copyright courts look at is how the party claiming fair use is using the copyrighted material.
This doesn’t necessarily mean that all commercial uses are unfair use and all noncommercial and educational use is fair, but it’s a pattern.
Next, courts look at the type of work that is being used. Use of copyrighted factuals works is more likely to be ruled fair use than use of a creative work. Use of an unpublished work is unlikely to be considered fair use of a copyrighted work.
Next, courts consider how much of the copyrighted work was used. Basically, the less of the work you use, the more likely it is to be fair use.
Finally, the court considers the impact of the unlicensed use of the work on the copyright holder and the potential market for the original work.
There are some types of work that require unique approaches to the finding of fair use.
Reviews and other forms of commentary and criticism are allowed to use parts of the work if it’s necessary to achieve its purpose. For example, quoting a book in a book review.
There have been a series of court cases related to fair use and internet publication. In 2003 Kelly vs. Arriba Soft Corp. was ruled that creating thumbnails of copyrighted images is considered transformative enough to be fair use. In 2008 the Northern District of California court ruled that a copyright holder can’t demand a takedown without a legal proceeding taking place.
Until 1991 music sampling was accepted practice, particularly in rap. Grand Upright Music, Ltd. vs. Warner Bros. Records set a precedent requiring artists to get a license to sample another artist’s music.
Parody requires using quite a bit of the original work in order for the joke to come across. For that reason, parodies are allowed to use more of the original work than other forms of using copyrighted works.
A series of court cases, including Author's Trust, Inc. vs. Google, Inc. and Author's Trust, Inc. vs. HathiTrust ruled that research tactics text and data mining are fair use. This ruling was due to the transformative nature of the processes.
United States fair use policy has influenced policies in the following countries:
Here at Sav, we’re dedicated to creating and protecting your digital identity from your domain to your website to the products and services you sell. Create an account today to get started.